Mangalore: St. Aloysius College has dress code for lecturers too
The Hindu
Mangalore, 30 April 2012: A journalism lecturer, who applied for a job at St. Aloysius College here, has alleged that she was told by the principal during the interview that wearing burqa was not allowed inside the classroom.
The allegation comes close on the heels of a controversy about the college prospectus for 2012-13 mentioning that students would have to remove burqa inside the classroom.
Safiya Naeem, a resident of Mangalore, said she was interviewed for the post of a journalism lecturer in June, 2011.
Principal’s stand
“When I met principal Father Swebert D’Silva for the interview, he told me that I would have to remove my burqa if I get the job. I said I did not mind not wearing the burqa, but I would not remove the head scarf.”
“If he can wear a cassock, what is wrong in I wearing a burqa? When the college authorities said the rule could not be changed, I rejected the job offer,” she said.
“They have no right to tell me what to wear or what to eat. It depends on my interest,” Ms. Naeem said.
Asked why she was levelling the allegation nearly a year after the incident occurred, Ms. Naeem said she had thought that the subject was limited only to her, but now it looked like many others too were affected by the decision of the college management.
Registrar of the college A.M. Narahari told The Hindu that he was not aware of the incident and it was the principal who should respond to the allegations.
“Several teachers wear the burqa outside the college but ‘voluntarily’ remove when they enter classrooms. Teachers and students should follow a dress code to maintain decency,” he said.
However, the principal was not available for comment.
Comments on this Article | |
Philip Mudartha, Qatar | Tue, May-1-2012, 11:18 |
1. The lady chose adherence to her socio-religious values and gave up the job out of her own free will, she has no basis to grumble. 2. If she made her decision under duress, she had a constitutional right to challenge SAC in a court of law. IT would have been a landmark case, where some fundamental issues could have been addressed and a precedent could be set. 3. It is likely that legal opinion was sought and a strong case did not exist. So, the situation is given a political angle now. 4. SAC is a private minority controlled institution with constitutional protection to frame its own rules that it can enforce as long as these rules do not violate basic principles of our constitution. It has right to impose dress code on everyone on its premises. It has also right to wave this rule to whosoever it deems fit at its own sole discretion. Like it can ask everyone to keep their pets home while coming there..:D 5. Since UGC aids the institution to pay salaries to its teaching staff, was UGC code(s) of conduct violated by management? The Registrar and Principal know the rules, consequences etc. | |
Baptist Sequeira, Moodubelle | Mon, April-30-2012, 4:19 |
Ok in one side people may appreciate but some will oppose what Fr. Swebert is doing. Being a high esteemed institution and providing education for so many years, without creating any issues to Muslim girls, why this new subject came in news is interesting. I was alumni of SAC. But after say 10years I took my friend for admission for Entrance Exam coaching classes in SAC. We paid fees in PU section but for an envelop to class start letter, we had to walk all the way from PU section to Post Office in court area. Then I asked the lady in the admission section why the intelligent priests can not include Rs 10 instead of Rs 5 in the total fees and keep some envelops at the office itself instead of making the students to walk all the way to post office and bring back an envelop. Instead of improving the common sense, do not create these BURKA kind of nuisances which are not appreciable by common people. Dear honorable priests please take our kind advices and try to improve your public life positively. |